From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31918 invoked by alias); 11 May 2009 11:32:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 31902 invoked by uid 22791); 11 May 2009 11:32:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from milford.webbase.net.nz (HELO milford.webbase.net.nz) (119.47.118.38) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 May 2009 11:32:20 +0000 Received: (qmail 6181 invoked by uid 65534); 11 May 2009 23:32:16 +1200 Received: from 203-184-42-82.callplus.net.nz (203-184-42-82.callplus.net.nz [203.184.42.82]) by webmail.i2mlabs.com (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Mon, 11 May 2009 23:32:16 +1200 Message-ID: <20090511233216.vhfwq5n1xcso0s48@webmail.i2mlabs.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 11:32:00 -0000 From: ricky.zheng@i2mlabs.com To: John Dallaway Cc: Jonathan Larmour , Simon Kallweit , eCos Maintainers Subject: Re: NAND support References: <49FFE56B.2070009@intefo.ch> <49FFFFBE.4030401@dallaway.org.uk> <4A0001D4.9050309@intefo.ch> <4A001A6A.3040304@dallaway.org.uk> <4A002ABD.9050009@intefo.ch> <4A004555.1030605@dallaway.org.uk> <4A042B26.8050808@eCosCentric.com> <4A0446C7.5090105@dallaway.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <4A0446C7.5090105@dallaway.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.6) Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 Hi all, Quoting John Dallaway : > Hi Jifl, Ricky and Simon > > Jonathan Larmour wrote: > >> John Dallaway wrote: >> >>> Jifl, can you also advise here please? Could dual licensing of UFFS >>> under both LGPL and the eCos Public License be achieved with a single >>> source base using a single license banner? >> >> Both these licences are acceptable to the FSF, so I can't see any issue >> with it. >> >> There's then the matter of how to achieve this. Here's my recommendation >> of how to modify the banner: > > [ snip ] > > Jifl, thanks for the example license text. This seems much more sensible > than maintaining two sets of sources with different license headers. > > Ricky, are you happy to incorporate the license headers proposed by Jifl > into your master sources? I think it's a great proposal, and I will do it by this weekend. About another UFFS (Unified FFS): I started UFFS (Ultra-low-cost FFS) at 2005 and released it to public=20=20 (sourceforge.net) under GPL at early 2007. Unified FFS project was=20=20 started at late 2008 by students from Epitech, the first stable=20=20 version is expected at next month. Ultra-low-cost FFS has no relationship with Unified FFS. > > Simon, it would be useful if you would post an outline of how you > propose to integrate UFFS and NAND device support with eCos to the > ecos-devel list so we can avoid any surprises later on. This will be a > great addition to eCos! eCos is a great platform, a working UFFS package on eCos certainly=20=20 encourage me put more effort on UFFS :) Cheers, Ricky Zheng