From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4857 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2009 06:55:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 4847 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jun 2009 06:55:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ascomax.hasler.ascom.ch (HELO ascomax.hasler.ascom.ch) (139.79.135.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 06:55:49 +0000 Received: from eiger.ma.tech.ascom.ch (eiger.ma.tech.ascom.ch [139.79.100.1]) by ascomax.hasler.ascom.ch (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n536tien019102; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 08:55:44 +0200 (MEST) Received: from [139.79.100.143] (helo=donkey.ma.tech.ascom.ch) by eiger.ma.tech.ascom.ch with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 1MBkNy-0004NR-00; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:55:42 +0200 Received: from lunn by donkey.ma.tech.ascom.ch with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MBkO0-0007pp-5A; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:55:44 +0200 Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 06:55:00 -0000 From: Andrew Lunn To: John Dallaway Cc: eCos Maintainers Subject: Re: NAND & YAFFS Message-ID: <20090603065544.GN8356@ma.tech.ascom.ch> References: <4A0AD212.60208@ecoscentric.com> <4A0B198F.6020109@dallaway.org.uk> <4A0D9D4D.6070308@ecoscentric.com> <20090518071342.GC8356@ma.tech.ascom.ch> <4A256CD6.6020002@dallaway.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A256CD6.6020002@dallaway.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 07:17:58PM +0100, John Dallaway wrote: > Hi Andrew > > Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > An FYI for some of the newbies who are maybe not subscribed to all the > > ecos-mailing lists: > > > > After checking with Ross and Paul, i've taken the technical discussion > > about eCosCentrics's NAND implementation over to ecos-devel. > > Have you been able to form a view on the relative merits of the VU > Amsterdam and eCosCentric implementations so far? Just wanting to ensure > that this process is not stalled for any reason... I have some first impressions, looking at the documentation. However the discussions should really be on ecos-devel, not this semi private list. Andrew