From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18907 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2010 10:59:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 18898 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Feb 2010 10:59:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-bw0-f211.google.com (HELO mail-bw0-f211.google.com) (209.85.218.211) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:59:51 +0000 Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so1909374bwz.33 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 02:59:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.141.69 with SMTP id l5mr767484bku.64.1265972388647; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 02:59:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([86.57.137.251]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 13sm1485387bwz.6.2010.02.12.02.59.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 12 Feb 2010 02:59:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:59:00 -0000 From: Sergei Gavrikov To: John Dallaway Cc: bob.brusa@gmail.com, eCos Maintainers Subject: Re: How to add patches to cvs-log Message-ID: <20100212105936.GA20021@sg-desktop> References: <4B752E3C.4020608@dallaway.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B752E3C.4020608@dallaway.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:32:28AM +0000, John Dallaway wrote: > Hi Robert > > Bob Brusa wrote: > > > on 14-Jan-2010 I sent a patch (devs_current_100114.epk) to ecos-patches > > at sources dot redhat dot com. I assumed it would then go (after review > > by an expert!) into the "current" cvs ecos repository. This does not > > seem to be the case as I learned yesterday when updating my ecos from > > the cvs. Did I follow a wrong procedure or does it just take some more > > time? > > Firstly, thank you for taking the time to contribute a patch for eCos. > > Unfortunately, patch review can take some time. The eCos maintainers > which are best placed to review your changes may be busy. I would > suggest that you re-post your changes to the ecos-patches list in the > form of a plain text attachment (generated using "diff -U5 -r") rather > than as an EPK file. This will make it much easier for individual > maintainers to review your changes at a glance. > > John Dallaway > eCos maintainer Hi Robert and John, A few years ago I knew about one link by the topic: http://ecos.sourceware.org/patches.html Unfortunately I cannot call where I 'bookmarked' it in my mind from. Just now I tried to find the reference looking the eCos front pages, and I couldn't find a reference on the link. But, Robert, That's it. HTH Sergei