From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ecos-maintainers-return-141-listarch-ecos-maintainers=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 26380 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2003 10:33:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 26292 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2003 10:33:32 -0000
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 01/15/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
X-Accept-Language: en_GB
In-Reply-To: <20030121101147.719AC6165C@delenn.bartv.net> 
References: <20030121101147.719AC6165C@delenn.bartv.net>  <3E2C9F52.70803@eCosCentric.com> 
To: Bart Veer <bartv@eCosCentric.com>
Cc: jifl@eCosCentric.com, ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: rbtree licence dilemma 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 10:33:00 -0000
Message-ID: <26028.1043145216@passion.cambridge.redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00021.txt.bz2


I assume this licence is more acceptable? :)

http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/~checkout~/src/sys/sys/tree.h?rev=1.7

--
dwmw2