Re: fix conflict with gcc thread local storage extension

[Jonathan Larmour <jifl@eCosCentric.com>]

Mark Salter wrote:
>>>>>>Gary Thomas writes:
> 
> 
>>On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 09:07, Mark Salter wrote:
>>
>>>Index: compat/posix/current/ChangeLog
>>>===================================================================
>>>RCS file: /cvs/ecos/ecos/packages/compat/posix/current/ChangeLog,v
>>>retrieving revision 1.43
>>>diff -u -p -5 -r1.43 ChangeLog
>>>--- compat/posix/current/ChangeLog	19 Mar 2003 14:17:20 -0000	1.43
>>>+++ compat/posix/current/ChangeLog	20 Mar 2003 16:05:01 -0000
>>>@@ -1,5 +1,10 @@
>>>+2003-03-20  Mark Salter  <msalter@redhat.com>
>>>+
>>>+	* include/pthread.h: Avoid conflict with recently introduced gcc
>>>+	__thread keyword.
>>>+
> 
> 
>>Wasn't that sweet of them?  What version does this show up in?
> 
> I'm seeing it in a 3.3 variant. I think it went into CVS around
> the December time frame.

Ouch. I wish they'd realise that they can't just add commonly occurring 
words to the namespace and think they can get away with it just because 
it's got "__" prepended, when it means many OS's will have to suffer.

This should go in the 2.0 branch too (maintainer list CC'd). The 
alternative is that upcoming GCC 3.3 will barf on eCos 2.0. This is also 
obviously a trivially benign change.

Jifl
-- 
eCosCentric    http://www.eCosCentric.com/    The eCos and RedBoot experts
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[  can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln   ]-- Opinions==mine