From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26885 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2003 13:40:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26878 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2003 13:40:38 -0000 Message-ID: <3E8C39C7.7030206@eCosCentric.com> Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 13:40:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Larmour User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030314 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Lunn Cc: eCos Maintainers Subject: Re: Pros and cons of FSF References: <3E8BB24E.7080107@eCosCentric.com> <20030403082554.GB19888@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch> In-Reply-To: <20030403082554.GB19888@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00013.txt.bz2 Andrew Lunn wrote: > Hi Jifl > > Many of the cons seem negotiable with FSF, depending on host strict > they are. Could you form a list of questions and see what they say? In fact, one of the purposes was to create this list so I could easily see what the questions were :-). Yes I can do it, but I'd like some buy-in that if the answers were all positive, this is something we would likely still want to pursue, given my summarising e-mail. So are others (Gary, Nick, Bart, John, Mark) definitely interested in pursuing this if the answers are positive? Jifl -- eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts --[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]-- --[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine