From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31515 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2003 19:05:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31478 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2003 19:05:29 -0000 Message-ID: <3E946EF6.7060704@eCosCentric.com> Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 19:05:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Larmour User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030314 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: eCos Maintainers Subject: [APPROVE?] GNU linkonce patch Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2 I just sent a fix for an obvious typo in various linker scripts to ecos-patches. A number of .ld files had .gnulinkonce.s instead of .gnu.linkonce.s. http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-patches/2003-04/msg00057.html It should be applied because a) it's obvious and b) without it people on quite a few targets may not have working new/delete. The risks are zero unless I had a finger fumble! Please someone say yes so I don't have to hang around worrying about whether I'll forget to apply it! :-) Jifl -- eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts --[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]-- --[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine