From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4197 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2003 04:47:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4148 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2003 04:47:06 -0000 Message-ID: <3E979A44.6060600@eCosCentric.com> Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 04:47:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Larmour User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030314 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Larmour Cc: eCos Maintainers Subject: Re: [APPROVE?] GNU linkonce patch References: <3E946EF6.7060704@eCosCentric.com> In-Reply-To: <3E946EF6.7060704@eCosCentric.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00031.txt.bz2 I won't apply the below patch in deference to Nick applying his linker scripts and mine together, which, since they touch the same files, is (presumably?) easier overall. I know he hasn't submitted them for approval yet, but I know he's going to ;). Jifl Jonathan Larmour wrote: > I just sent a fix for an obvious typo in various linker scripts to > ecos-patches. A number of .ld files had .gnulinkonce.s instead of > .gnu.linkonce.s. > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-patches/2003-04/msg00057.html > > It should be applied because a) it's obvious and b) without it people on > quite a few targets may not have working new/delete. The risks are zero > unless I had a finger fumble! > > Please someone say yes so I don't have to hang around worrying about > whether I'll forget to apply it! :-) > > Jifl -- eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts --[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]-- --[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine