From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14233 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2003 12:21:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14226 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2003 12:21:25 -0000 Message-ID: <3E9AA7C4.9010304@eCosCentric.com> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 12:21:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Larmour User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030314 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Garnett Cc: eCos Maintainers Subject: Re: [APPROVE?] GNU linkonce patch References: <3E946EF6.7060704@eCosCentric.com> <3E979A44.6060600@eCosCentric.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00040.txt.bz2 Nick Garnett wrote: > Jonathan Larmour writes: > > >>I won't apply the below patch in deference to Nick applying his linker >>scripts and mine together, which, since they touch the same files, is >>(presumably?) easier overall. >> >>I know he hasn't submitted them for approval yet, but I know he's going to ;). > > > I was actually waiting for you and Bart to submit your patches for > approval before submitting mine. As above, I'll leave "mine" to you to avoid more hassle for you merging ChangeLogs again, but if you prefer me to do mine separately I can do that too. As for Bart's, if you mean the __cxx_pure_virtual thing, that's already been approved and checked in, so go for it :-). cvs -q diff -D 2003-04-09 -D 2003-04-11 hal does the diff, if you strip out the trivial change to hal/arm/xscale/ixp425/current/ChangeLog Jifl -- eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts --[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]-- --[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine