From: Alex Schuilenburg <alexs@ecoscentric.com>
To: eCos Maintainers <ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: eCos bitrot
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 11:38:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ECCB5B7.7020404@ecoscentric.com> (raw)
Hi Dudes
The eCosCentric test farm is making pretty good progress, most of it is
not visible yet unfortunately (yes, my fault, I am kept occupied on
other trivial but necessary stuff).
Anyway, here is a brief update:
* We are building perms and tests for various targets
* We are running automated tests for those targets
* Results are in raw log files which are easily turned into HTML,
including summaries, although we are not wasting time tidying this as
we are going for the final result: logging the results in the
database.
The results so far for anoncvs have been very interesting:
Builds
------
* 1 perm now fails to configure
* 11 perms will no longer build
* 3 perms produce errors building tests (make tests error)
* *all* perms produce build warnings
Tests
-----
So far we have only put in the EBSA targets (courtesy ASCOM) as the
other targets need work: For e.g. PID:- Need RedBoot in EPROM and we
don't have a suitable programmer; PLC2 and LAKI:- need to get platform
specific code and permission from ASCOM;
The EBSA has around a 90-95% pass rate for the tests that actually
build, which is not bad considering. All are timeouts (cache1, kcache1,
etc). We (eCosCentric) are looking into these. I hope to have the build
and test result display working within a week or so. We can make the
raw results available if anyone wants to jump the gun and fix the
problems before the result pages are displayed - just let me know.
Jld is putting in some additional targets this afternoon and we should
be up to 5-10% of the size the farm was at Red Hat shortly :-) We need
to extract the serial port terminal server from Bart and get that
working to get more targets in place, although we are no longer
restricted to requiring a serial port to determine reset OK.
Summary
-------
On the whole, we are pleased with the stability of the new farm.
Results appear a lot more consistent (i.e. less noise and
spurious/WFM-style errors) and we managed to run 4854 tests in a 24 hour
period for a single platform. So a full cycle should take around 3-4
days insead of the usual 2 weeks.
We hope this will be a very useful resource for you and an extremely
beneficial service for our customers.
Paul is the only one complaining as the rats have moved out the test
farm and into his house because of the constant clacking ;-)
-- Alex
next reply other threads:[~2003-05-22 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-22 11:38 Alex Schuilenburg [this message]
2003-05-22 11:52 ` Andrew Lunn
2003-05-22 12:28 ` Alex Schuilenburg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3ECCB5B7.7020404@ecoscentric.com \
--to=alexs@ecoscentric.com \
--cc=ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).