From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15811 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2003 14:32:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15803 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2003 14:32:44 -0000 Message-ID: <3F2E6E8B.5010501@eCosCentric.com> Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 14:32:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Larmour User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Lunn Cc: eCos Maintainers Subject: Re: FSF assignment status References: <20030804094121.GA1771@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch> In-Reply-To: <20030804094121.GA1771@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 Andrew Lunn wrote: > Hi Folks > > I see that Nick has put a draft FSF assignment document into CVS. > > What is the status? What is the best guess for swapping to FSF? There's a few things we to need to ask them that cropped up, so I'd guess not this week... maybe a couple of weeks. Obviously then we'll honour our gentleman's agreement and assign all our code to the FSF. Jifl -- eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts --[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]-- --[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine