From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31030 invoked by alias); 15 Aug 2003 18:21:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31023 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2003 18:21:18 -0000 Message-ID: <3F3C77C2.6050206@eCosCentric.com> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 18:21:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Larmour Organization: eCosCentric Ltd. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Maley Cc: ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com, Mark Salter Subject: Re: eCos engineering contact in RedHat References: <1060910778.1260.58.camel@apu.rdu.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1060910778.1260.58.camel@apu.rdu.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2 Dave Maley wrote: > Hello. One of my TAM accounts, Tekelec, has requested a contact within > our embedded (eCos) engineering group to ask a few questions about eCos > RTOS. My understanding of the current position is that Red Hat doesn't do any eCos development any more, only RedBoot, although if Mark Salter (CC'd) is reading this I would be more than happy to be corrected... I don't want to start tell anyone that if it isn't true (FWIW I haven't so far, but it's what I believe is the case in practice). > I wasn't able to find much recent information regarding eCos on > the Red Hat Intranet so I wasn't sure where to direct this request, or > if eCos is even part of Red Hat anymore. Mark Salter is the best starting point for anything eCos/RedBoot related within Red Hat I guess - he can pass you on to someone else if not. Jifl -- eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts --[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]-- --[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine