From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7030 invoked by alias); 13 May 2004 13:23:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7014 invoked from network); 13 May 2004 13:23:31 -0000 Message-ID: <40A376D0.3040909@eCosCentric.com> Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 13:23:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Larmour User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Lunn Cc: eCos Maintainers Subject: Re: Documentation License References: <40A14B02.3010006@eCosCentric.com> <20040513130906.GU23252@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch> In-Reply-To: <20040513130906.GU23252@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 Andrew Lunn wrote: > > I presume we could change the wording a little. "... BY THE FREEBSD > DOCUMENTATION PROJECT..." to "... BY THE EcOS PROJECT...". > > Otherwise i think this License is OK. Yes definitely. And it would be the "ECOS DOCUMENTATION LICENSE" (tempting to call it LICENCE but I'll relent :-)). Jifl -- eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts --["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine