From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22294 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2004 16:48:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22287 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2004 16:48:27 -0000 Message-ID: <40C49C59.1000307@eCosCentric.com> Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 16:48:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Larmour User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jani Monoses Cc: Andrea Michelotti , ecos-maintainers@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: jtst (based on diopsis chip) new AT91 platform References: <012c01c44c9b$d68f1680$0b0110ac@ipitec.it> <20040607173629.3ec03589.jani@iv.ro> In-Reply-To: <20040607173629.3ec03589.jani@iv.ro> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00012.txt.bz2 Jani Monoses wrote: >>thank you. >> >>Andrea. > > > The AT91_USART0 and BAUD defines can go in the plf_io.h of the platform like > the eb42 and eb55 do it, so the diff gets even smaller :). Also those defines > which are only on the platform you're using like the SPI or the MAGIC arm > ones, unless they are also present on other new at91 boards. Indeed. If it's common to any board using the CPU variant, that's fine; if it's platform specific, it goes in the platform HAL. Andrea - when you're happy with the patch, I assume you would want to formally submit it, in which case can I point you at http://ecos.sourceware.org/patches.html particularly the bit about assignments, which needs to be gotten out of the way first! Thanks, Jifl -- eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts --["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine