From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9046 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2004 10:37:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8991 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2004 10:37:43 -0000 Message-ID: <40DFF4EA.3040207@eCosCentric.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:37:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Larmour User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Alex Schuilenburg , ecos-maintainers@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: New Assignment: AFTEK References: <40DFD273.6010104@ecoscentric.com> <20040628082518.GA1435@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch> In-Reply-To: <20040628082518.GA1435@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2 Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 09:10:27AM +0100, Alex Schuilenburg wrote: > >>Attached. >> >>And before anyone asks, this is all that was sent in two seperate 1 page >>faxes. The fax was stored electronically so the address resolution is a >>result of the sender's fax scanner. No list of files was provided. > > > Mostly useless... > > We need to track down what this is for. I've no idea. It does not fit > to any contribution i know of which is in the pipeline. Ah, no I know this one (and you can see - barely - my name at the top of the first page). It's this contrib: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000068 which doesn't contain Aftek either. > Googling for "aftek infosys eCos" only produces two old hits. If you > can make out the senders FAX numbers could you send a FAX back asking > them to telephone/email you so we can get this straightened out. I'll follow up by e-mail directly. Jifl -- eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts --["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine