From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11301 invoked by alias); 3 Jul 2004 17:01:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11293 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2004 17:01:37 -0000 Message-ID: <40E6E683.8000805@jifvik.org> Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 17:01:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Larmour User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-GB; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Schuilenburg CC: Gary Thomas , eCos Maintainers Subject: Re: FSF & copyright status References: <1088613920.6277.190.camel@hermes> <40E3CB95.2080502@ecoscentric.com> In-Reply-To: <40E3CB95.2080502@ecoscentric.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 Alex Schuilenburg wrote: > Gary Thomas wrote: > >> Dynamic IP Address See: >> http://www.dnsbl.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/lookup?IP=81.104.194.28 >> >> Any new status on this? Is it ever going to happen? >> > > From status updates by Red Hat it looks like it is going to happen, we > just don't know when. The last exchange in mid-May with Red Hat legal > on this topic said "... we are now there... the next few weeks." > > Naturally, the guys here and eCosCentric are ready on our side with all > the assignments and contributions of the code we hold copyright to (and > have been for quite a while), so when Red Hat do move we can switch to > the FSF fairly quickly. Well, to be more accurate, that may depend a little on the responsiveness of the FSF which cannot be taken for granted! Jifl -- --[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]-- --[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine