From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8507 invoked by alias); 4 May 2005 15:03:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8295 invoked from network); 4 May 2005 15:03:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.ecoscentric.com) (194.153.168.165) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 4 May 2005 15:03:53 -0000 Received: by smtp.ecoscentric.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id D599B65C0B9; Wed, 4 May 2005 16:03:52 +0100 (BST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA43765C064; Wed, 4 May 2005 16:03:51 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4278E459.4010402@eCosCentric.com> Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 15:03:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Larmour User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Thomas Cc: eCos Maintainers Subject: Re: FSF status References: <1115217479.5511.88.camel@hermes> In-Reply-To: <1115217479.5511.88.camel@hermes> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on norbert.ecoscentric.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 Gary Thomas wrote: > Jonathan, > > Time for another ping? I've pinged the FSF and asked them if they've had a response from RH. Mark S asked me about the state last week (or maybe the week before) and I filled him in. He said he was going to chase it up internally. Mark, any joy? Or are you in the same boat as me :). Jifl -- eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts --[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]-- --[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine