From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ecos-maintainers-return-930-listarch-ecos-maintainers=sources.redhat.com@ecos.sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 2220 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2005 11:29:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-subscribe@ecos.sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-maintainers@ecos.sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-help@ecos.sourceware.org>, <http://ecos.sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@ecos.sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 2196 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jun 2005 11:29:51 -0000
Received: from norbert.ecoscentric.com (HELO smtp.ecoscentric.com) (194.153.168.165)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:29:51 +0000
Received: by smtp.ecoscentric.com (Postfix, from userid 99)
	id 28A1C65C0A9; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 12:29:50 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D1965C057;
	Wed, 22 Jun 2005 12:29:49 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <42B94BAD.6010105@eCosCentric.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:29:00 -0000
From: Jonathan Larmour <jifl@eCosCentric.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1.3.3 (X11/20050513)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew.lunn@ascom.ch>
Cc: eCos Maintainers <ecos-maintainers@ecos.sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Commentary on the OPL
References: <42B1733F.6060501@eCosCentric.com> <20050622091904.GW3201@donkey.ma.tech.ascom.ch> <42B9470C.3050602@eCosCentric.com> <20050622111539.GX3201@donkey.ma.tech.ascom.ch>
In-Reply-To: <20050622111539.GX3201@donkey.ma.tech.ascom.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on 
	norbert.ecoscentric.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
	version=2.63
X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2

Andrew Lunn wrote:
> While we are on the subject of FSF, is it time to ping somebody again?

Yep. It was, as per my earlier mail which presumably you're remembering 
:). Mark W should (hopefully!) be looking at it this week, but as per that 
earlier mail I have sent a reminder anyway.

Jifl
-- 
eCosCentric    http://www.eCosCentric.com/    The eCos and RedBoot experts
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine