From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17633 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2006 15:41:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 17623 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jan 2006 15:41:25 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from snape.ecoscentric.com (HELO snape.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.199) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:41:23 +0000 Received: from [192.168.7.9] (dargo.barn.ecoscentric.com [192.168.7.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by snape.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C7F2C005; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:41:20 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <43C6789F.10606@jifvik.org> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:41:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Larmour User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc3 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Chase, Thomas" Cc: "'ecos-maintainers@ecos.sourceware.org'" Subject: Re: Assignment query References: <3EDBCCE80E95E744A99895CA464987C44BB087@dtcsrvr09> In-Reply-To: <3EDBCCE80E95E744A99895CA464987C44BB087@dtcsrvr09> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 Chase, Thomas wrote: > Hi, > > I am in the process of doing a copyright assignment. I have the company > disclaimer taken care of, and am wondering if I can use something similar to > what I have attached to cover the individual writers. I am trying to avoid > sending multiple assignments to cover the work that we have done and will do > in the future. So instead of multiple copies of the individual assignment > (one for each of the people that have participated in a port) can I send > something like: [snip] As long as DTC Communications _is_ the copyright holder of the works in question (usually due to a clause in the employee's employment contract) then that should be fine. Thanks. Jifl -- --["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine