* EL/IX
@ 2008-03-10 10:29 Jonathan Larmour
2008-03-10 10:36 ` EL/IX Andrew Lunn
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Larmour @ 2008-03-10 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: eCos Maintainers
The sourceware overseers are agitating for removing the EL/IX project since
it's extremely dead. They have a point.
http://sourceware.org/elix/
However we refer to it in a few places from our docs.
Should I either:
1) object entirely?
2) Incorporate the EL/IX spec into the eCos project?
or
3) Just remove all our EL/IX references.
Personally I think 3. It's time to just face up to the fact it's dead.
Jifl
--
eCosCentric Limited http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos experts
** Visit us at ESC Silicon Valley <http://www.embedded.com/esc/sv> **
** April 15-17 2008, Booth 3012, San Jose McEnery Convention Center **
Barnwell House, Barnwell Drive, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 1223 245571
Registered in England and Wales: Reg No 4422071.
------["Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere"]------ Opinions==mine
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: EL/IX
2008-03-10 10:29 EL/IX Jonathan Larmour
@ 2008-03-10 10:36 ` Andrew Lunn
2008-03-10 10:57 ` EL/IX Gary Thomas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Lunn @ 2008-03-10 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Larmour; +Cc: eCos Maintainers
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:29:10AM +0000, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> The sourceware overseers are agitating for removing the EL/IX project since
> it's extremely dead. They have a point.
>
> http://sourceware.org/elix/
>
> However we refer to it in a few places from our docs.
>
> Should I either:
> 1) object entirely?
> 2) Incorporate the EL/IX spec into the eCos project?
> or
> 3) Just remove all our EL/IX references.
>
> Personally I think 3. It's time to just face up to the fact it's dead.
I agree. Remove all references.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: EL/IX
2008-03-10 10:36 ` EL/IX Andrew Lunn
@ 2008-03-10 10:57 ` Gary Thomas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gary Thomas @ 2008-03-10 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Lunn; +Cc: Jonathan Larmour, eCos Maintainers
Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:29:10AM +0000, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>> The sourceware overseers are agitating for removing the EL/IX project since
>> it's extremely dead. They have a point.
>>
>> http://sourceware.org/elix/
>>
>> However we refer to it in a few places from our docs.
>>
>> Should I either:
>> 1) object entirely?
>> 2) Incorporate the EL/IX spec into the eCos project?
>> or
>> 3) Just remove all our EL/IX references.
>>
>> Personally I think 3. It's time to just face up to the fact it's dead.
>
> I agree. Remove all references.
Absolutely - nuke that stillborn madness...
(sorry, did I say/write that out loud?)
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas | Consulting for the
MLB Associates | Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-03-10 10:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-03-10 10:29 EL/IX Jonathan Larmour
2008-03-10 10:36 ` EL/IX Andrew Lunn
2008-03-10 10:57 ` EL/IX Gary Thomas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).