From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 967 invoked by alias); 18 Jul 2008 14:16:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 953 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jul 2008 14:16:28 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_14 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from d5152C2DE.access.telenet.be (HELO lx-dmz.televic.com) (81.82.194.222) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:16:08 +0000 Received: (qmail 3311 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2008 14:16:03 -0000 Received: from nt-email.televic.com (10.0.0.9) by lx-dmz.televic.com with SMTP; 18 Jul 2008 14:16:03 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([10.0.56.49]) by nt-email.TELEVIC.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:15:53 +0200 Message-ID: <4880A599.3040008@televic.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:16:00 -0000 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Lambrecht?= Organization: Televic User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Lunn CC: ecos-maintainers@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: AT91 References: <48808390.9040106@televic.com> <20080718115742.GA24316@lunn.ch> In-Reply-To: <20080718115742.GA24316@lunn.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jul 2008 14:15:53.0916 (UTC) FILETIME=[C9FCB7C0:01C8E8E0] Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 01:50:40PM +0200, J?rgen Lambrecht wrote: > >> We work with AT91 ARM chips. I can help there. >> OK, now I have a clear deadline to commit a (nearly ;-) bugfree at91 >> EMAC ethernet driver. >> > > Help with AT91 platforms would be great. I have AT91SAM7X-EK and > AT91SAM7S-EK boards. What i don't have is any boards with external > memory interfaces. Without that, using the FreeBSD stack is > impossible, which is why you have found all these EMAC issues. So if > you can test on bigger AT91 systems that would be great. > ok. We have boards with an AT91M55800A with NOR flash, SRAM, Compact Flash and memory-mapped Ethernet. And we have boards with an AT91SAM9260 with NOR flash, NAND flash, SDRAM and MII Ethernet. We also have the Atmel EKs with those processors. I would like to add the arm9 board to ecos ... one day. Our network is the backbone of the system and must be very reliable, hence the heavy tests we run. (Our UDP test perl script is GPL if you would be interested) > Also, please don't leave you patch to the last minute. We need to work > on a clean way to handle the copy from SDRAM into SRAM for your > platform without imposing it on other AT91 devices which don't need > it. This might take a couple of iterations to get right. > OK. Kind regards, Juergen > Andrew >