From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23568 invoked by alias); 18 May 2009 09:39:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 23557 invoked by uid 22791); 18 May 2009 09:39:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 May 2009 09:39:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1723B40033; Mon, 18 May 2009 10:39:18 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.ecoscentric.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Xq+g5W-fFTP; Mon, 18 May 2009 10:39:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (farm.ecoscentric.com [62.249.226.156]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: paulb@ecoscentric.com) by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD62B60B8008; Mon, 18 May 2009 10:39:16 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4A112CC3.1040001@ecoscentric.com> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 09:39:00 -0000 From: Paul Beskeen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Lunn CC: Simon Kallweit , ecos-maintainers@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: NAND & YAFFS References: <4A0AD212.60208@ecoscentric.com> <4A0C6674.5030006@cs.vu.nl> <20090515095150.GH17679@ma.tech.ascom.ch> <4A0D4189.6040109@intefo.ch> <20090516095007.GC31991@ma.tech.ascom.ch> In-Reply-To: <20090516095007.GC31991@ma.tech.ascom.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2 Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:18:49PM +0200, Simon Kallweit wrote: >> Andrew Lunn wrote: >>> Hi Folks > [...] >>> There is a possibility of it happening again soon >>> as well. eCosCentric have a more modern lwIP port in there tree than >>> the current in anoncvs. I understand they have optimized it for small >>> platform and made it more stable. There is the current effort going on >>> to update the anoncvs lwip code. When this reaches maturity, which >>> looks like will happen soon, are eCosCentric going to pull out there >>> trump card again and contribute there lwip port? >> Well well, I almost saw that coming :/ > > Would eCosCentric like to make a comment regarding this subject? We have no plans to contribute our lwIP work. Developing the eCos public version based on the very latest sources seems the appropriate way to go long term. Paul.