From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22508 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2009 18:18:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 22499 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Jun 2009 18:18:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (HELO mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com) (81.103.221.49) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:18:09 +0000 Received: from aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20090602181801.MPPI5579.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2009 19:18:01 +0100 Received: from cog.dallaway.org.uk ([86.9.207.237]) by aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vG.2.02.00.01 201-2161-120-102-20060912) with ESMTP id <20090602181801.QGXZ13254.aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@cog.dallaway.org.uk>; Tue, 2 Jun 2009 19:18:01 +0100 Received: from cog.dallaway.org.uk (cog.dallaway.org.uk [127.0.0.1]) by cog.dallaway.org.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n52IHwSI007274; Tue, 2 Jun 2009 19:17:59 +0100 Message-ID: <4A256CD6.6020002@dallaway.org.uk> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:18:00 -0000 From: John Dallaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090327) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Lunn CC: eCos Maintainers Subject: Re: NAND & YAFFS References: <4A0AD212.60208@ecoscentric.com> <4A0B198F.6020109@dallaway.org.uk> <4A0D9D4D.6070308@ecoscentric.com> <20090518071342.GC8356@ma.tech.ascom.ch> In-Reply-To: <20090518071342.GC8356@ma.tech.ascom.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2 Hi Andrew Andrew Lunn wrote: > An FYI for some of the newbies who are maybe not subscribed to all the > ecos-mailing lists: > > After checking with Ross and Paul, i've taken the technical discussion > about eCosCentrics's NAND implementation over to ecos-devel. Have you been able to form a view on the relative merits of the VU Amsterdam and eCosCentric implementations so far? Just wanting to ensure that this process is not stalled for any reason... John Dallaway