From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23163 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2009 21:02:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 22986 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jun 2009 21:02:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,URIBL_RHS_DOB X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from virtual.bogons.net (HELO virtual.bogons.net) (193.178.223.136) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 21:01:49 +0000 Received: from jifvik.dyndns.org (jifvik.dyndns.org [85.158.45.40]) by virtual.bogons.net (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.2) with ESMTP id n5EL1k429207; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:01:46 +0100 (BST) Received: from [172.31.1.127] (neelix.jifvik.org [172.31.1.127]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by jifvik.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71A33FEB; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:01:45 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4A356538.5090507@jifvik.org> Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 21:02:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Larmour User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.8-1.1.fc4 (X11/20060501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Thomas Cc: H Hartley Sweeten , ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org, eCos Maintainers Subject: Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support References: <4A300CB0.5060102@mlbassoc.com> In-Reply-To: <4A300CB0.5060102@mlbassoc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 Gary Thomas wrote: > H Hartley Sweeten wrote: > >>Hello all, >> >>Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support? >>http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739 >> >>Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed? If so, would it >>be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into >>CVS so that they can be cleaned up? The diff appears fairly clean >>except for a couple of issues. Following are the files in the patch. >> > > > AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet. Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they never made an assignment. Jifl -- --["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine