From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18336 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2009 01:19:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 18318 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jun 2009 01:19:30 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hermes.mlbassoc.com (HELO mail.chez-thomas.org) (76.76.67.137) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:19:21 +0000 Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 999) id 4B8C63B52A72; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:19:19 -0600 (MDT) Received: from hermes.chez-thomas.org (hermes_local [192.168.1.101]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA383B5261B; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:19:18 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <4A35A196.9010801@mlbassoc.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:19:00 -0000 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Larmour CC: H Hartley Sweeten , ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org, eCos Maintainers Subject: Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support References: <4A300CB0.5060102@mlbassoc.com> <4A356538.5090507@jifvik.org> In-Reply-To: <4A356538.5090507@jifvik.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 Jonathan Larmour wrote: > Gary Thomas wrote: >> H Hartley Sweeten wrote: >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support? >>> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739 >>> >>> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed? If so, would it >>> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into >>> CVS so that they can be cleaned up? The diff appears fairly clean >>> except for a couple of issues. Following are the files in the patch. >>> >> >> >> AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet. > > Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they never > made an assignment. They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April timeframe, maybe a bit later. It should be in the logs (I don't have time to search right now). -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------