From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29332 invoked by alias); 17 Sep 2009 20:54:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 29308 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Sep 2009 20:54:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from virtual.bogons.net (HELO virtual.bogons.net) (193.178.223.136) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:54:02 +0000 Received: from jifvik.dyndns.org (jifvik.dyndns.org [85.158.45.40]) by virtual.bogons.net (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.2) with ESMTP id n8HKrx416165; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:53:59 +0100 (BST) Received: from [172.31.1.126] (neelix.jifvik.org [172.31.1.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by jifvik.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E423FEB; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:53:57 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4AB2A1E4.3020703@jifvik.org> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:54:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Larmour User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.8-1.1.fc4 (X11/20060501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: H Hartley Sweeten Cc: Gary Thomas , ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org, eCos Maintainers Subject: Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support References: <4A300CB0.5060102@mlbassoc.com> <4A356538.5090507@jifvik.org> <4A35A196.9010801@mlbassoc.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 H Hartley Sweeten wrote: > On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: > >>Jonathan Larmour wrote: >> >>>Gary Thomas wrote: >>> >>>>H Hartley Sweeten wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Hello all, >>>>> >>>>>Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support? >>>>>http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739 >>>>> >>>>>Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed? If so, would it >>>>>be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into >>>>>CVS so that they can be cleaned up? The diff appears fairly clean >>>>>except for a couple of issues. Following are the files in the patch. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet. >>> >>>Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they never >>>made an assignment. >> >>They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April >>timeframe, maybe a bit later. It should be in the logs (I don't have >>time to search right now). > > > Does anyone know the status of this? > > I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the > original patch is still not in CVS. I'm afraid there is still no record with the FSF that they've submitted an assignment. Either the FSF haven't updated their master database, or they never actually completed the assignment. I think you'd need to ask Cirrus. Jifl -- --["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine