* Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support [not found] <BD79186B4FD85F4B8E60E381CAEE1909019173AD@mi8nycmail19.Mi8.com> @ 2009-06-10 19:42 ` Gary Thomas 2009-06-14 21:02 ` Jonathan Larmour 2009-08-07 15:36 ` John Dallaway 0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Gary Thomas @ 2009-06-10 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H Hartley Sweeten; +Cc: ecos-patches, eCos Maintainers H Hartley Sweeten wrote: > Hello all, > > Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support? > http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739 > > Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed? If so, would it > be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into > CVS so that they can be cleaned up? The diff appears fairly clean > except for a couple of issues. Following are the files in the patch. > AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet. -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support 2009-06-10 19:42 ` Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support Gary Thomas @ 2009-06-14 21:02 ` Jonathan Larmour 2009-06-15 1:19 ` Gary Thomas 2009-08-07 15:36 ` John Dallaway 1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Larmour @ 2009-06-14 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gary Thomas; +Cc: H Hartley Sweeten, ecos-patches, eCos Maintainers Gary Thomas wrote: > H Hartley Sweeten wrote: > >>Hello all, >> >>Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support? >>http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739 >> >>Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed? If so, would it >>be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into >>CVS so that they can be cleaned up? The diff appears fairly clean >>except for a couple of issues. Following are the files in the patch. >> > > > AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet. Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they never made an assignment. Jifl -- --["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support 2009-06-14 21:02 ` Jonathan Larmour @ 2009-06-15 1:19 ` Gary Thomas 2009-09-16 21:31 ` H Hartley Sweeten 0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: Gary Thomas @ 2009-06-15 1:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jonathan Larmour; +Cc: H Hartley Sweeten, ecos-patches, eCos Maintainers Jonathan Larmour wrote: > Gary Thomas wrote: >> H Hartley Sweeten wrote: >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support? >>> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739 >>> >>> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed? If so, would it >>> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into >>> CVS so that they can be cleaned up? The diff appears fairly clean >>> except for a couple of issues. Following are the files in the patch. >>> >> >> >> AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet. > > Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they never > made an assignment. They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April timeframe, maybe a bit later. It should be in the logs (I don't have time to search right now). -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support 2009-06-15 1:19 ` Gary Thomas @ 2009-09-16 21:31 ` H Hartley Sweeten 2009-09-17 8:54 ` John Dallaway 2009-09-17 20:54 ` Jonathan Larmour 0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: H Hartley Sweeten @ 2009-09-16 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gary Thomas, Jonathan Larmour; +Cc: ecos-patches, eCos Maintainers On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: > Jonathan Larmour wrote: >> Gary Thomas wrote: >>> H Hartley Sweeten wrote: >>> >>>> Hello all, >>>> >>>> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support? >>>> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739 >>>> >>>> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed? If so, would it >>>> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into >>>> CVS so that they can be cleaned up? The diff appears fairly clean >>>> except for a couple of issues. Following are the files in the patch. >>>> >>> >>> >>> AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet. >> >> Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they never >> made an assignment. > > They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April > timeframe, maybe a bit later. It should be in the logs (I don't have > time to search right now). Does anyone know the status of this? I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the original patch is still not in CVS. Thanks for your time, Hartley ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support 2009-09-16 21:31 ` H Hartley Sweeten @ 2009-09-17 8:54 ` John Dallaway 2009-09-17 20:54 ` Jonathan Larmour 1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: John Dallaway @ 2009-09-17 8:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H Hartley Sweeten; +Cc: eCos Maintainers Hi Hartley H Hartley Sweeten wrote: > On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: >> Jonathan Larmour wrote: >>> Gary Thomas wrote: >>>> H Hartley Sweeten wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello all, >>>>> >>>>> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support? >>>>> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739 >>>>> >>>>> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed? If so, would it >>>>> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into >>>>> CVS so that they can be cleaned up? The diff appears fairly clean >>>>> except for a couple of issues. Following are the files in the patch. >>>> >>>> AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet. >>> Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they never >>> made an assignment. >> They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April >> timeframe, maybe a bit later. It should be in the logs (I don't have >> time to search right now). > > Does anyone know the status of this? > > I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the > original patch is still not in CVS. I contacted the contributor 2009-08-07. The assignment paperwork had been unavoidably delayed for due to ill health. We are anticipating confirmation of this assignment at any time now. John Dallaway ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support 2009-09-16 21:31 ` H Hartley Sweeten 2009-09-17 8:54 ` John Dallaway @ 2009-09-17 20:54 ` Jonathan Larmour 2009-09-17 21:10 ` H Hartley Sweeten 1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Larmour @ 2009-09-17 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H Hartley Sweeten; +Cc: Gary Thomas, ecos-patches, eCos Maintainers H Hartley Sweeten wrote: > On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: > >>Jonathan Larmour wrote: >> >>>Gary Thomas wrote: >>> >>>>H Hartley Sweeten wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Hello all, >>>>> >>>>>Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support? >>>>>http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739 >>>>> >>>>>Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed? If so, would it >>>>>be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into >>>>>CVS so that they can be cleaned up? The diff appears fairly clean >>>>>except for a couple of issues. Following are the files in the patch. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet. >>> >>>Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they never >>>made an assignment. >> >>They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April >>timeframe, maybe a bit later. It should be in the logs (I don't have >>time to search right now). > > > Does anyone know the status of this? > > I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the > original patch is still not in CVS. I'm afraid there is still no record with the FSF that they've submitted an assignment. Either the FSF haven't updated their master database, or they never actually completed the assignment. I think you'd need to ask Cirrus. Jifl -- --["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support 2009-09-17 20:54 ` Jonathan Larmour @ 2009-09-17 21:10 ` H Hartley Sweeten 2009-09-17 21:18 ` Austin, Brian 0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: H Hartley Sweeten @ 2009-09-17 21:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Austin, Brian Cc: Jonathan Larmour, Gary Thomas, ecos-patches, eCos Maintainers On Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:54 PM, Jonathan Larmour wrote: > H Hartley Sweeten wrote: >> On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: >> >>> Jonathan Larmour wrote: >>> >>>> Gary Thomas wrote: >>>> >>>>> H Hartley Sweeten wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hello all, >>>>>> >>>>>> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support? >>>>>> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739 >>>>>> >>>>>> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed? If so, would it >>>>>> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into >>>>>> CVS so that they can be cleaned up? The diff appears fairly clean >>>>>> except for a couple of issues. Following are the files in the patch. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet. >>>> >>>> Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they never >>>> made an assignment. >>> >>> They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April >>> timeframe, maybe a bit later. It should be in the logs (I don't have >>> time to search right now). >> >> >> Does anyone know the status of this? >> >> I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the >> original patch is still not in CVS. > > I'm afraid there is still no record with the FSF that they've submitted an > assignment. Either the FSF haven't updated their master database, or they > never actually completed the assignment. I think you'd need to ask Cirrus. Hello Brian, On May 12, 2009 you posted this message to the ecos-discuss list: > I am sending off the contracts to the FSF, and have posted the patch for > the Cirrus Port's to the ecos bugzilla. Hopefully someone will start to > forward port the code base. Did the contracts ever get submitted? Your patch is still in the ecos bugzilla but cannot be added until they receive the official confirmation from FSF. Thanks, Hartley ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support 2009-09-17 21:10 ` H Hartley Sweeten @ 2009-09-17 21:18 ` Austin, Brian 2009-11-18 16:31 ` H Hartley Sweeten 0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: Austin, Brian @ 2009-09-17 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H Hartley Sweeten Cc: Jonathan Larmour, Gary Thomas, ecos-patches, eCos Maintainers Crap! Sorry guys, I'll mail that off. -----Original Message----- From: H Hartley Sweeten [mailto:hartleys@visionengravers.com] Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 4:11 PM To: Austin, Brian Cc: Jonathan Larmour; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org; eCos Maintainers Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support On Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:54 PM, Jonathan Larmour wrote: > H Hartley Sweeten wrote: >> On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: >> >>> Jonathan Larmour wrote: >>> >>>> Gary Thomas wrote: >>>> >>>>> H Hartley Sweeten wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hello all, >>>>>> >>>>>> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support? >>>>>> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739 >>>>>> >>>>>> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed? If so, would it >>>>>> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into >>>>>> CVS so that they can be cleaned up? The diff appears fairly clean >>>>>> except for a couple of issues. Following are the files in the patch. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet. >>>> >>>> Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they never >>>> made an assignment. >>> >>> They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April >>> timeframe, maybe a bit later. It should be in the logs (I don't have >>> time to search right now). >> >> >> Does anyone know the status of this? >> >> I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the >> original patch is still not in CVS. > > I'm afraid there is still no record with the FSF that they've submitted an > assignment. Either the FSF haven't updated their master database, or they > never actually completed the assignment. I think you'd need to ask Cirrus. Hello Brian, On May 12, 2009 you posted this message to the ecos-discuss list: > I am sending off the contracts to the FSF, and have posted the patch for > the Cirrus Port's to the ecos bugzilla. Hopefully someone will start to > forward port the code base. Did the contracts ever get submitted? Your patch is still in the ecos bugzilla but cannot be added until they receive the official confirmation from FSF. Thanks, Hartley ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support 2009-09-17 21:18 ` Austin, Brian @ 2009-11-18 16:31 ` H Hartley Sweeten 2009-11-18 16:33 ` Austin, Brian 0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: H Hartley Sweeten @ 2009-11-18 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Austin, Brian Cc: Jonathan Larmour, Gary Thomas, ecos-patches, eCos Maintainers On Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:19 PM, Austin, Brian wrote: > > Crap! Sorry guys, > > I'll mail that off. > Hello Brian, Hate to be a pain but, did you ever get the paperwork submitted to the FSF to transfer the copyright assignment for the Cirrus ep93xx eCos port? Thanks, Hartley -----Original Message----- From: H Hartley Sweeten [mailto:hartleys@visionengravers.com] Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 4:11 PM To: Austin, Brian Cc: Jonathan Larmour; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org; eCos Maintainers Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support On Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:54 PM, Jonathan Larmour wrote: > H Hartley Sweeten wrote: >> On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: >> >>> Jonathan Larmour wrote: >>> >>>> Gary Thomas wrote: >>>> >>>>> H Hartley Sweeten wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hello all, >>>>>> >>>>>> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support? >>>>>> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739 >>>>>> >>>>>> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed? If so, would it >>>>>> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into >>>>>> CVS so that they can be cleaned up? The diff appears fairly clean >>>>>> except for a couple of issues. Following are the files in the patch. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet. >>>> >>>> Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they never >>>> made an assignment. >>> >>> They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April >>> timeframe, maybe a bit later. It should be in the logs (I don't have >>> time to search right now). >> >> >> Does anyone know the status of this? >> >> I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the >> original patch is still not in CVS. > > I'm afraid there is still no record with the FSF that they've submitted an > assignment. Either the FSF haven't updated their master database, or they > never actually completed the assignment. I think you'd need to ask Cirrus. Hello Brian, On May 12, 2009 you posted this message to the ecos-discuss list: > I am sending off the contracts to the FSF, and have posted the patch for > the Cirrus Port's to the ecos bugzilla. Hopefully someone will start to > forward port the code base. Did the contracts ever get submitted? Your patch is still in the ecos bugzilla but cannot be added until they receive the official confirmation from FSF. Thanks, Hartley ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support 2009-11-18 16:31 ` H Hartley Sweeten @ 2009-11-18 16:33 ` Austin, Brian 2009-11-19 9:37 ` John Dallaway 2009-11-19 18:38 ` Jonathan Larmour 0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Austin, Brian @ 2009-11-18 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H Hartley Sweeten Cc: Jonathan Larmour, Gary Thomas, ecos-patches, eCos Maintainers Hey guys, I have been trying to find the paper work to mail off to the FSF, but cant find it. Legal gave it the go ahead. I totally folded on this and am sorry, Can you point me to the person at the FSF to resend me the paper work, so I can sign it and send it off. Sorry again for the fowlup. Brian Austin -----Original Message----- From: H Hartley Sweeten [mailto:hartleys@visionengravers.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 10:30 AM To: Austin, Brian Cc: Jonathan Larmour; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org; eCos Maintainers Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support On Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:19 PM, Austin, Brian wrote: > > Crap! Sorry guys, > > I'll mail that off. > Hello Brian, Hate to be a pain but, did you ever get the paperwork submitted to the FSF to transfer the copyright assignment for the Cirrus ep93xx eCos port? Thanks, Hartley -----Original Message----- From: H Hartley Sweeten [mailto:hartleys@visionengravers.com] Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 4:11 PM To: Austin, Brian Cc: Jonathan Larmour; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org; eCos Maintainers Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support On Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:54 PM, Jonathan Larmour wrote: > H Hartley Sweeten wrote: >> On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: >> >>> Jonathan Larmour wrote: >>> >>>> Gary Thomas wrote: >>>> >>>>> H Hartley Sweeten wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hello all, >>>>>> >>>>>> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support? >>>>>> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739 >>>>>> >>>>>> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed? If so, would it >>>>>> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into >>>>>> CVS so that they can be cleaned up? The diff appears fairly clean >>>>>> except for a couple of issues. Following are the files in the patch. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet. >>>> >>>> Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they never >>>> made an assignment. >>> >>> They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April >>> timeframe, maybe a bit later. It should be in the logs (I don't have >>> time to search right now). >> >> >> Does anyone know the status of this? >> >> I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the >> original patch is still not in CVS. > > I'm afraid there is still no record with the FSF that they've submitted an > assignment. Either the FSF haven't updated their master database, or they > never actually completed the assignment. I think you'd need to ask Cirrus. Hello Brian, On May 12, 2009 you posted this message to the ecos-discuss list: > I am sending off the contracts to the FSF, and have posted the patch for > the Cirrus Port's to the ecos bugzilla. Hopefully someone will start to > forward port the code base. Did the contracts ever get submitted? Your patch is still in the ecos bugzilla but cannot be added until they receive the official confirmation from FSF. Thanks, Hartley ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support 2009-11-18 16:33 ` Austin, Brian @ 2009-11-19 9:37 ` John Dallaway 2009-11-19 18:38 ` Jonathan Larmour 1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: John Dallaway @ 2009-11-19 9:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Austin, Brian; +Cc: eCos Maintainers Hi Brian Austin, Brian wrote: > I have been trying to find the paper work to mail off to the FSF, but > cant find it. Legal gave it the go ahead. > > I totally folded on this and am sorry, > > Can you point me to the person at the FSF to resend me the paper work, > so I can sign it and send it off. I suggest you try the Copyright Clerk e-mail address: copyright-clerk@fsf.org John Dallaway ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support 2009-11-18 16:33 ` Austin, Brian 2009-11-19 9:37 ` John Dallaway @ 2009-11-19 18:38 ` Jonathan Larmour 2010-03-13 0:08 ` H Hartley Sweeten 1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Larmour @ 2009-11-19 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Austin, Brian Cc: H Hartley Sweeten, Gary Thomas, ecos-patches, eCos Maintainers Austin, Brian wrote: > Hey guys, > > I have been trying to find the paper work to mail off to the FSF, but > cant find it. Legal gave it the go ahead. > > I totally folded on this and am sorry, > > Can you point me to the person at the FSF to resend me the paper work, > so I can sign it and send it off. Hi Brian, This page gives you the form you need to fill in, and the email address for it go to. They'll then send you the paperwork again. http://ecos.sourceware.org/ecos/assign.html Thanks for contributing! Jifl > -----Original Message----- > From: H Hartley Sweeten [mailto:hartleys@visionengravers.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 10:30 AM > To: Austin, Brian > Cc: Jonathan Larmour; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org; > eCos Maintainers > Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support > > On Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:19 PM, Austin, Brian wrote: > >>Crap! Sorry guys, >> >>I'll mail that off. >> > > > Hello Brian, > > Hate to be a pain but, did you ever get the paperwork submitted to the > FSF to transfer the copyright assignment for the Cirrus ep93xx eCos > port? > > Thanks, > Hartley > > -----Original Message----- > From: H Hartley Sweeten [mailto:hartleys@visionengravers.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 4:11 PM > To: Austin, Brian > Cc: Jonathan Larmour; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org; > eCos Maintainers > Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support > > On Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:54 PM, Jonathan Larmour wrote: > >>H Hartley Sweeten wrote: >> >>>On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Jonathan Larmour wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Gary Thomas wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>H Hartley Sweeten wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>Hello all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 > > support? > >>>>>>>http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed? If so, would > > it > >>>>>>>be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into >>>>>>>CVS so that they can be cleaned up? The diff appears fairly > > clean > >>>>>>>except for a couple of issues. Following are the files in the > > patch. > >>>>>> >>>>>>AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet. >>>>> >>>>>Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they > > never > >>>>>made an assignment. >>>> >>>>They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April >>>>timeframe, maybe a bit later. It should be in the logs (I don't > > have > >>>>time to search right now). >>> >>> >>>Does anyone know the status of this? >>> >>>I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the >>>original patch is still not in CVS. >> >>I'm afraid there is still no record with the FSF that they've > > submitted an > >>assignment. Either the FSF haven't updated their master database, or > > they > >>never actually completed the assignment. I think you'd need to ask > > Cirrus. > > Hello Brian, > > On May 12, 2009 you posted this message to the ecos-discuss list: > > >>I am sending off the contracts to the FSF, and have posted the patch > > for > >>the Cirrus Port's to the ecos bugzilla. Hopefully someone will start > > to > >>forward port the code base. > > > Did the contracts ever get submitted? Your patch is still in the ecos > bugzilla but cannot be added until they receive the official > confirmation > from FSF. > > Thanks, > Hartley > > > > -- --["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support 2009-11-19 18:38 ` Jonathan Larmour @ 2010-03-13 0:08 ` H Hartley Sweeten 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: H Hartley Sweeten @ 2010-03-13 0:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jonathan Larmour, Austin, Brian Cc: H Hartley Sweeten, Gary Thomas, ecos-patches, eCos Maintainers Hello Brian, Any update on this? Regards, Hartley -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Larmour [mailto:jifl@jifvik.org] Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 11:38 AM To: Austin, Brian Cc: H Hartley Sweeten; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org; eCos Maintainers Subject: Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support Austin, Brian wrote: > Hey guys, > > I have been trying to find the paper work to mail off to the FSF, but > cant find it. Legal gave it the go ahead. > > I totally folded on this and am sorry, > > Can you point me to the person at the FSF to resend me the paper work, > so I can sign it and send it off. Hi Brian, This page gives you the form you need to fill in, and the email address for it go to. They'll then send you the paperwork again. http://ecos.sourceware.org/ecos/assign.html Thanks for contributing! Jifl > -----Original Message----- > From: H Hartley Sweeten [mailto:hartleys@visionengravers.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 10:30 AM > To: Austin, Brian > Cc: Jonathan Larmour; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org; > eCos Maintainers > Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support > > On Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:19 PM, Austin, Brian wrote: > >>Crap! Sorry guys, >> >>I'll mail that off. >> > > > Hello Brian, > > Hate to be a pain but, did you ever get the paperwork submitted to the > FSF to transfer the copyright assignment for the Cirrus ep93xx eCos > port? > > Thanks, > Hartley > > -----Original Message----- > From: H Hartley Sweeten [mailto:hartleys@visionengravers.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 4:11 PM > To: Austin, Brian > Cc: Jonathan Larmour; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org; > eCos Maintainers > Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support > > On Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:54 PM, Jonathan Larmour wrote: > >>H Hartley Sweeten wrote: >> >>>On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Jonathan Larmour wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Gary Thomas wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>H Hartley Sweeten wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>Hello all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 > > support? > >>>>>>>http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed? If so, would > > it > >>>>>>>be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into >>>>>>>CVS so that they can be cleaned up? The diff appears fairly > > clean > >>>>>>>except for a couple of issues. Following are the files in the > > patch. > >>>>>> >>>>>>AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet. >>>>> >>>>>Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they > > never > >>>>>made an assignment. >>>> >>>>They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April >>>>timeframe, maybe a bit later. It should be in the logs (I don't > > have > >>>>time to search right now). >>> >>> >>>Does anyone know the status of this? >>> >>>I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the >>>original patch is still not in CVS. >> >>I'm afraid there is still no record with the FSF that they've > > submitted an > >>assignment. Either the FSF haven't updated their master database, or > > they > >>never actually completed the assignment. I think you'd need to ask > > Cirrus. > > Hello Brian, > > On May 12, 2009 you posted this message to the ecos-discuss list: > > >>I am sending off the contracts to the FSF, and have posted the patch > > for > >>the Cirrus Port's to the ecos bugzilla. Hopefully someone will start > > to > >>forward port the code base. > > > Did the contracts ever get submitted? Your patch is still in the ecos > bugzilla but cannot be added until they receive the official > confirmation > from FSF. > > Thanks, > Hartley > > > > -- --["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support 2009-06-10 19:42 ` Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support Gary Thomas 2009-06-14 21:02 ` Jonathan Larmour @ 2009-08-07 15:36 ` John Dallaway 2009-08-07 15:53 ` Austin, Brian 1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: John Dallaway @ 2009-08-07 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Brian Austin; +Cc: eCos Maintainers Hi Brian We continue to receive queries about the eCos port to EP93xx hardware but we have not yet received notification from the FSF that the copyright assignment and company disclaimer are in place. Sometimes notifications from the FSF can be delayed or lost. Can you please confirm that these documents were definitely submitted to the FSF as described at: http://ecos.sourceware.org/assign.html Thank you John Dallaway eCos Maintainer ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support 2009-08-07 15:36 ` John Dallaway @ 2009-08-07 15:53 ` Austin, Brian 2009-08-07 16:19 ` John Dallaway 0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: Austin, Brian @ 2009-08-07 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: John Dallaway; +Cc: eCos Maintainers Hi John, Sorry for the delay. I was involved in a bicycle accident and have been out of the office for some time. I have the forms here with me and will mail them off. Sorry again for the delay, Brian Austin -----Original Message----- From: John Dallaway [mailto:john@dallaway.org.uk] Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 10:36 AM To: Austin, Brian Cc: eCos Maintainers Subject: Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support Hi Brian We continue to receive queries about the eCos port to EP93xx hardware but we have not yet received notification from the FSF that the copyright assignment and company disclaimer are in place. Sometimes notifications from the FSF can be delayed or lost. Can you please confirm that these documents were definitely submitted to the FSF as described at: http://ecos.sourceware.org/assign.html Thank you John Dallaway eCos Maintainer ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support 2009-08-07 15:53 ` Austin, Brian @ 2009-08-07 16:19 ` John Dallaway 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: John Dallaway @ 2009-08-07 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Austin, Brian; +Cc: eCos Maintainers Hi Brian Austin, Brian wrote: > Sorry for the delay. I was involved in a bicycle accident and have been > out of the office for some time. I have the forms here with me and will > mail them off. Thanks for the speedy reply. Take it easy... John Dallaway ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-13 0:08 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <BD79186B4FD85F4B8E60E381CAEE1909019173AD@mi8nycmail19.Mi8.com> 2009-06-10 19:42 ` Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support Gary Thomas 2009-06-14 21:02 ` Jonathan Larmour 2009-06-15 1:19 ` Gary Thomas 2009-09-16 21:31 ` H Hartley Sweeten 2009-09-17 8:54 ` John Dallaway 2009-09-17 20:54 ` Jonathan Larmour 2009-09-17 21:10 ` H Hartley Sweeten 2009-09-17 21:18 ` Austin, Brian 2009-11-18 16:31 ` H Hartley Sweeten 2009-11-18 16:33 ` Austin, Brian 2009-11-19 9:37 ` John Dallaway 2009-11-19 18:38 ` Jonathan Larmour 2010-03-13 0:08 ` H Hartley Sweeten 2009-08-07 15:36 ` John Dallaway 2009-08-07 15:53 ` Austin, Brian 2009-08-07 16:19 ` John Dallaway
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).