From: Fabrice Gautier <Fabrice_Gautier@sdesigns.com>
To: "'ecos-discuss@sourceware.org'" <ecos-discuss@sourceware.org>,
Jonathan Larmour <jifl@eCosCentric.com>
Cc: eCos discussion <ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com>,
eCos Maintainers <ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: RE: [ECOS] sources.redhat.com downtime
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 20:34:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9F77D654ED40B74CA79E5A60B97A087B0423CE@sd-exchange.sdesigns.com> (raw)
Are they going to upgrade the cvs server to a new version of cvs also?
I remember the current one has an annoying bug when making diff (If i
remember correctly...)
--
Fabrice Gautier,
Fabrice_Gautier@sdesigns.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 10:32 PM
> To: Jonathan Larmour
> Cc: eCos discussion; eCos Maintainers
> Subject: Re: [ECOS] sources.redhat.com downtime
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 10:57:06PM +0000, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> >It's not much warning,
>
> I would have given more, if I could.
>
> >but it's just been revealed that the long promised upgrade of
> >sources.redhat.com will take place this coming Saturday at:
> >
> >10am PST
> > 1pm EST
> > 6pm GMT
> > 7pm CET
> >
> >and no doubt other timezones :-).
> >
> >It will probably not return until Sunday morning. At a
> minimum it will be
> >three hours if everything goes well, but don't count on it.
> If it's not
> >up, it's not up.
> >
> >All services will be off-line at that point: no cvs, web,
> ftp, or mailing
> >lists. We can't even hear you scream ;-).
> >
> >It's definitely worth it as it will be a move to a much
> newer, faster and
> >larger machine.
>
> And one with a lot more net bandwidth, too. It's better in every way.
>
> Now, if *that* doesn't jinx me, nothing will.
>
> >That should make for a quiet weekend :).
>
> For some people, maybe. :-)
>
> cgf
>
> --
> Before posting, please read the FAQ:
http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
next reply other threads:[~2003-01-17 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-17 20:34 Fabrice Gautier [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-16 22:57 Jonathan Larmour
2003-01-17 6:31 ` [ECOS] " Christopher Faylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9F77D654ED40B74CA79E5A60B97A087B0423CE@sd-exchange.sdesigns.com \
--to=fabrice_gautier@sdesigns.com \
--cc=ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=ecos-discuss@sourceware.org \
--cc=ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jifl@eCosCentric.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).