From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30940 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2009 21:31:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 30921 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Sep 2009 21:31:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from exprod6og110.obsmtp.com (HELO exprod6og110.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:31:09 +0000 Received: from source ([63.240.6.3]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob110.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKSrFZG9nTl22aqiSpghG4PIGASLm1ZfVg@postini.com; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:31:09 PDT Received: from D01SMTP04.Mi8.com ([172.16.1.243]) by Outbound02.Mi8.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:31:06 -0400 Received: from mi8nycmail19.Mi8.com ([172.16.7.219]) by D01SMTP04.Mi8.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:31:06 -0400 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:31:00 -0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4A35A196.9010801@mlbassoc.com> References: <4A300CB0.5060102@mlbassoc.com> <4A356538.5090507@jifvik.org> <4A35A196.9010801@mlbassoc.com> From: "H Hartley Sweeten" To: "Gary Thomas" , "Jonathan Larmour" Cc: , "eCos Maintainers" Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2 On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: > Jonathan Larmour wrote: >> Gary Thomas wrote: >>> H Hartley Sweeten wrote: >>> >>>> Hello all, >>>> >>>> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support? >>>> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1000739 >>>> >>>> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed? If so, would it >>>> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into >>>> CVS so that they can be cleaned up? The diff appears fairly clean >>>> except for a couple of issues. Following are the files in the patch. >>>> >>> >>> >>> AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet. >>=20 >> Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they never >> made an assignment. > > They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April > timeframe, maybe a bit later. It should be in the logs (I don't have > time to search right now). Does anyone know the status of this? I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the original patch is still not in CVS. Thanks for your time, Hartley