public inbox for ecos-maintainers@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Austin, Brian" <Brian.Austin@cirrus.com>
To: "H Hartley Sweeten" <hartleys@visionengravers.com>
Cc: "Jonathan Larmour" <jifl@jifvik.org>,
	"Gary Thomas" <gary@mlbassoc.com>,
	        <ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org>,
	        "eCos Maintainers" <ecos-maintainers@ecos.sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:18:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <C171323BB93CB94897E300CBB6D4537F1D941E21@CLMSG-01.ad.cirrus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BD79186B4FD85F4B8E60E381CAEE190901D41E30@mi8nycmail19.Mi8.com>

Crap!  Sorry guys,

I'll mail that off.

-----Original Message-----
From: H Hartley Sweeten [mailto:hartleys@visionengravers.com] 
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 4:11 PM
To: Austin, Brian
Cc: Jonathan Larmour; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org;
eCos Maintainers
Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

On Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:54 PM, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>> On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>> 
>>> Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9
support?
>>>>>> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would
it
>>>>>> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
>>>>>> CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly
clean
>>>>>> except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the
patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet.
>>>>
>>>> Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they
never
>>>> made an assignment.
>>>
>>> They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April
>>> timeframe, maybe a bit later.  It should be in the logs (I don't
have
>>> time to search right now).
>> 
>> 
>> Does anyone know the status of this?
>>
>> I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the
>> original patch is still not in CVS.
>
> I'm afraid there is still no record with the FSF that they've
submitted an 
> assignment. Either the FSF haven't updated their master database, or
they 
> never actually completed the assignment. I think you'd need to ask
Cirrus.

Hello Brian,

On May 12, 2009 you posted this message to the ecos-discuss list:

> I am sending off the contracts to the FSF, and have posted the patch
for
> the Cirrus Port's to the ecos bugzilla.  Hopefully someone will start
to
> forward port the code base.

Did the contracts ever get submitted?  Your patch is still in the ecos
bugzilla but cannot be added until they receive the official
confirmation
from FSF.

Thanks,
Hartley


  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-17 21:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <BD79186B4FD85F4B8E60E381CAEE1909019173AD@mi8nycmail19.Mi8.com>
2009-06-10 19:42 ` Gary Thomas
2009-06-14 21:02   ` Jonathan Larmour
2009-06-15  1:19     ` Gary Thomas
2009-09-16 21:31       ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-09-17  8:54         ` John Dallaway
2009-09-17 20:54         ` Jonathan Larmour
2009-09-17 21:10           ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-09-17 21:18             ` Austin, Brian [this message]
2009-11-18 16:31               ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-11-18 16:33                 ` Austin, Brian
2009-11-19  9:37                   ` John Dallaway
2009-11-19 18:38                   ` Jonathan Larmour
2010-03-13  0:08                     ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-08-07 15:36   ` John Dallaway
2009-08-07 15:53     ` Austin, Brian
2009-08-07 16:19       ` John Dallaway

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=C171323BB93CB94897E300CBB6D4537F1D941E21@CLMSG-01.ad.cirrus.com \
    --to=brian.austin@cirrus.com \
    --cc=ecos-maintainers@ecos.sourceware.org \
    --cc=ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org \
    --cc=gary@mlbassoc.com \
    --cc=hartleys@visionengravers.com \
    --cc=jifl@jifvik.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).