From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28279 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2014 22:26:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Received: (qmail 28268 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jan 2014 22:26:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail.ihostasp.net Received: from mail01.ihostasp.net (HELO mail.ihostasp.net) (209.190.184.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 22:26:55 +0000 Received: from 75-163-161-5.clsp.qwest.net [75.163.161.5] by mail.ihostasp.net with SMTP; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 17:26:46 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: Freescale and Lua copyrights From: Michael Jones In-Reply-To: <52E7DC14.7090206@jifvik.org> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 22:26:00 -0000 Cc: ecos-maintainers@ecos.sourceware.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <52E29EE4.5050702@jifvik.org> <52E7DC14.7090206@jifvik.org> To: Jonathan Larmour X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 Jifl, Ok. I have also asked Freescale for a more formal/public statement or to pu= t the statement in the files themselves. Let's see if I can get any tractio= n from that. Michael Jones email: mike@proclivis.com ecos iMX6Q Project: https://sourceforge.net/projects/ecosfreescale On Jan 28, 2014, at 9:34 AM, Jonathan Larmour wrote: > On 24/01/14 22:33, Michael Jones wrote: >> Jifl, >>=20 >> I did a bit of research, and I found that when you download the iMX6 SDK= , there is a LICENSE.txt in the root directory with the following text: >=20 > I expect that is fine then, but you will need to paste that into the top > of each of the individual files in that case so that there's no uncertain= ty. >=20 > Also, a mention of this in some package documentation would be valuable, > thanks. >=20 >> Does this satisfy the requirements and allow the code in? >=20 > Subject to code review, I think so. >=20 > Jifl > --=20 > --["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions=3D= =3Dmine