From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ecos-maintainers-return-270-listarch-ecos-maintainers=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 15929 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2003 18:11:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 15911 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2003 18:11:32 -0000
To: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
Cc: John Dallaway <jld@ecoscentric.com>,
	eCos Maintainers <ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: New CPM/DPRAM allocator
References: <200303180848.24682.jld@ecoscentric.com>
	<200303191019.45969.jld@ecoscentric.com>
	<m3znnrk420.fsf@miso.calivar.com>
	<200303191545.45265.jld@ecoscentric.com>
	<1048093613.7462.5303.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org>
	<m34r5zjjxe.fsf@miso.calivar.com>
	<1048098401.9579.5496.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org>
	<m3znnri3z1.fsf@miso.calivar.com>
	<1048100525.7462.5617.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org>
	<m3el52i7cl.fsf@miso.calivar.com>
	<1048166054.7459.9069.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org>
From: Nick Garnett <nickg@ecoscentric.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 18:11:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <1048166054.7459.9069.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org>
Message-ID: <m3adfqhwpn.fsf@miso.calivar.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00043.txt.bz2

Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com> writes:

> On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 04:51, Nick Garnett wrote:
> > Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com> writes:
> > 
> > > With the attached version of the code, I think we'll be
> > > quite safe.  This changes the behaviour of the code, mitigating
> > > the possibility of clashes, but it's not 100%.
> > > 
> > > Is there any way you can test this?  Do you have the original
> > > Adder ROM contents?  If not, I've attached what I sent to A&M
> > > when it was first released.
> > 
> > I've now tried this: it works correctly on the Adder with the old
> > RedBoot in place. So this change has my approval, for both the trunk
> > and the v2 branch.
> 
> Excellent.  I'll be committing this patch to the branch (trunk 
> is already done).  Just a final "looks good" please.
> 

Looks OK to me. I'll take your serial device changes on trust.

Once you have committed this I'll commit the if_quicc.c changes I have
waiting.


-- 
Nick Garnett                    eCos Kernel Architect
http://www.ecoscentric.com/     The eCos and RedBoot experts