From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ecos-maintainers-return-733-listarch-ecos-maintainers=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 1036 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2004 10:21:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 1028 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2004 10:21:26 -0000
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: eCos Maintainers <ecos-maintainers@ecos.sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: FWD: [ECOS] Problem with PowerPC cache init order
References: <20040621095820.GD2031@lunn.ch>
From: Nick Garnett <nickg@ecoscentric.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:21:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <20040621095820.GD2031@lunn.ch>
Message-ID: <m3d63tqkil.fsf@xl5.calivar.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00018.txt.bz2

Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> writes:

> Hi Folks
> 
> Could somebody who knows about PPC caches take a look at this patch.
> 
>         Thanks
>                 Andrew
> 

I think this is OK. It seems to make sense to me, however I also share
Mark's concern that this may not be applicable to all PowerPC parts.

Gary is probably more familiar with this code and the various PowerPC
variants than I am at present, so I was hoping that he would give it a
once over.

-- 
Nick Garnett                    eCos Kernel Architect
http://www.ecoscentric.com/     The eCos and RedBoot experts