From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6743 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2003 13:02:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6730 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2003 13:02:51 -0000 To: Gary Thomas Cc: John Dallaway , eCos Maintainers Subject: Re: New CPM/DPRAM allocator References: <200303180848.24682.jld@ecoscentric.com> <200303191019.45969.jld@ecoscentric.com> <200303191545.45265.jld@ecoscentric.com> <1048093613.7462.5303.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org> <1048098401.9579.5496.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org> <1048100525.7462.5617.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org> From: Nick Garnett Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 13:02:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1048100525.7462.5617.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00041.txt.bz2 Gary Thomas writes: > With the attached version of the code, I think we'll be > quite safe. This changes the behaviour of the code, mitigating > the possibility of clashes, but it's not 100%. > > Is there any way you can test this? Do you have the original > Adder ROM contents? If not, I've attached what I sent to A&M > when it was first released. I've now tried this: it works correctly on the Adder with the old RedBoot in place. So this change has my approval, for both the trunk and the v2 branch. -- Nick Garnett eCos Kernel Architect http://www.ecoscentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts