From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3898 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2003 18:07:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3889 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2003 18:07:39 -0000 To: Jonathan Larmour Cc: Andrew Lunn , John Dallaway , ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: SNMP for FreeBSD References: <200303180848.24682.jld@ecoscentric.com> <1047995318.7459.2925.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org> <200303181605.21189.jld@ecoscentric.com> <20030318191618.GG17373@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch> <3E786EAA.5050200@eCosCentric.com> From: Nick Garnett Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 18:07:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3E786EAA.5050200@eCosCentric.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00034.txt.bz2 Jonathan Larmour writes: > Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > >> c) A rationale for including the patch in the 2.0 final release. > > Currently the branch only supports SNMP with the OpenBSD stack. This > > is no longer the default stack for 2.0b1. FreeBSD should become the > > stack everyone uses, but if people want SNMP they are forced to use > > the old stack. This patch touches the two snmp packages only. It does > > have the risk of breaking the OpenBSD support for snmp :-( > > This is a highly desirable patch as it gets rid of a long-standing > issue, and Andrew has tested it, and Ascom have used the stack far > more than any other user anyway! I would very much like to have it, > although I can see why it wouldn't be considered "critical". So I'll > leave it to John to make a final decision. > It gets my vote too. -- Nick Garnett eCos Kernel Architect http://www.ecoscentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts