From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17292 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2006 11:03:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 17281 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Sep 2006 11:03:36 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net (HELO anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net) (194.217.242.88) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Sep 2006 11:03:32 +0000 Received: from calivar.demon.co.uk ([83.104.54.243] helo=xl5.calivar.com) by anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1GLHf3-000MFn-2J; Thu, 07 Sep 2006 11:03:19 +0000 Received: from xl5.calivar.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xl5.calivar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43512138872; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 12:03:09 +0100 (BST) To: Andrew Lunn Cc: eCos Maintainers Subject: Re: mbox questions/possible bugs? References: <20060907093902.GJ20668@lunn.ch> From: Nick Garnett Original-Sender: nickg@ecoscentric.com Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 11:03:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20060907093902.GJ20668@lunn.ch> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-09/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 Andrew Lunn writes: > Hi Maintainers > > Could somebody please take a look at the mbox issues raised a while > ago... > > http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss/2006-08/msg00170.html > http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-devel/2006-08/msg00004.html These are kernel issues, so I guess I should look at them. The first needs a bit of investigation but the second of these is clearly a bug and needs to be fixed. -- Nick Garnett eCos Kernel Architect http://www.ecoscentric.com The eCos and RedBoot experts