From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ecos-maintainers-return-267-listarch-ecos-maintainers=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 28535 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2003 01:32:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 28450 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2003 01:32:26 -0000
To: Jonathan Larmour <jifl@eCosCentric.com>
Cc: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>,
	John Dallaway <jld@ecoscentric.com>,
	eCos Maintainers <ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [APPROVE] EB40 RedBoot doc patch for 2.0 branch
References: <200303191632.42131.jld@ecoscentric.com>
	<1048092814.9579.5271.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org>
	<3E78D255.5090708@eCosCentric.com>
From: Nick Garnett <nickg@ecoscentric.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 01:32:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <3E78D255.5090708@eCosCentric.com>
Message-ID: <m3r892j2kc.fsf@miso.calivar.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00040.txt.bz2

Jonathan Larmour <jifl@eCosCentric.com> writes:

> In fact, shall we just say that doc patches (like target patches) are exempt?
> 
> I'm also beginning to dislike this "voting" thing as such in the sense
> that it's very noisy and it's not clear when consensus is reached and
> it's okay to apply the patch. I'd prefer it to be "objections only".

I'll vote for that :-)

-- 
Nick Garnett                    eCos Kernel Architect
http://www.ecoscentric.com/     The eCos and RedBoot experts