From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8256 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2003 18:52:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8247 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2003 18:52:21 -0000 To: Gary Thomas Cc: John Dallaway , eCos Maintainers Subject: Re: New CPM/DPRAM allocator References: <200303180848.24682.jld@ecoscentric.com> <200303191019.45969.jld@ecoscentric.com> <200303191545.45265.jld@ecoscentric.com> <1048093613.7462.5303.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org> <1048098401.9579.5496.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org> From: Nick Garnett Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 18:52:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1048098401.9579.5496.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00037.txt.bz2 Gary Thomas writes: > > Only that the old code didn't use 0x2000 for it's buffers, but > 0x2800 (for the serial ports). The only driver that this should > affect would be the serial driver in the installed RedBoot. If > the new allocator is using a different "base", then there should > be no conflict. OK. I hadn't realized that. Have you moved QUICC_BD_BASE before? Could the original Adder RedBoot have been using 0x2000 too? > > Do you recall what configurations/templates/etc you were using? Nothing special. The standard net template with some config to give the ethernet device a static IP address, and turn assertions on. Nothing that would affect things at this level. -- Nick Garnett eCos Kernel Architect http://www.ecoscentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts