From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1192 invoked by alias); 13 Aug 2007 07:33:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 1104 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Aug 2007 07:33:19 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from londo.lunn.ch (HELO londo.lunn.ch) (80.238.139.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 07:33:16 +0000 Received: from lunn by londo.lunn.ch with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1IKULT-000107-00; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:28:11 +0200 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 07:33:00 -0000 From: Andrew Lunn To: Hans Rosenfeld Cc: Sergei Gavrikov , ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: drivers for LPC2xxx on-chip peripherals Message-ID: <20070813072811.GK13510@lunn.ch> References: <20070712152151.GA9252@grumpf.hope-2000.org> <20070812213139.GA6590@ubuntu> <20070812235652.GA28495@grumpf.hope-2000.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070812235652.GA28495@grumpf.hope-2000.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-patches-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-patches-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00016.txt.bz2 > The real problem behind this is that the flash code does AFAIK not > directly support flash memories with more than one erase block size. Take a look at the flash_v2 branch in CVS. It supports different size blocks. I hope to someday soon get this merged into the trunk. Andrew