From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14906 invoked by alias); 5 May 2009 15:38:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 14888 invoked by uid 22791); 5 May 2009 15:38:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 May 2009 15:38:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73C13B40059 for ; Tue, 5 May 2009 16:38:50 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.ecoscentric.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uUmeserUdgwp; Tue, 5 May 2009 16:38:49 +0100 (BST) From: bugzilla-daemon@ecoscentric.com To: ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Bug 1000740] Public Domain Curses for eCos X-Bugzilla-Reason: QAcontact X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos X-Bugzilla-Component: Patches and contributions X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: sergei.gavrikov@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: john@dallaway.org.uk X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 15:38:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20090505153849.7F3993B40030@mail.ecoscentric.com> Mailing-List: contact ecos-patches-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-patches-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000740 --- Comment #6 from Sergei Gavrikov 2009-05-05 16:38:47 --- (In reply to comment #5) > I will review this package this afternoon. > John, thank you for your time. I want to say that I did a few commits during these days. Those were small fixes for big-endian targets. Unfortunately, I have no BE target. The stuff was tested on ARM LE target and Linux synthetic target. Thanks Steven Clugston (he has BE powerpc-based board) I was able to get the mails from him about BE issues. Unfortunately, he is AFK this week and I have not got yet a final verdict from him. What will you prefer: 1) to wait the BE verdict, 2) new diff against that patch, 3) new patch, or 4) mercurial's pull for changesets? Thanks, Sergei -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.