From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13198 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2011 20:15:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 13182 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jan 2011 20:15:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 20:15:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49DC42F78006 for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 20:15:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ecoscentric.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GZOwMt4CaaIV; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 20:15:01 +0000 (GMT) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org To: ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Bug 1001116] Instruct lwIP to use special section for buffers and heap. X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos X-Bugzilla-Component: Patches and contributions X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: ilijak@siva.com.mk X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: low X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 20:15:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20110129201501.4E44C2F80002@mail.ecoscentric.com> Mailing-List: contact ecos-patches-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-patches-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2 Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001116 --- Comment #16 from Ilija Kocho 2011-01-29 20:14:59 GMT --- It seem we've been working in parallel. You can skip my previous post (comment #15). (In reply to comment #14) > Ilija, at the least I would stop on this > > - lwip_net.cdl: > > cdl_option CYGSEM_LWIP_MEM_SECTION { > ... > flavor bool > default_value 0 > active_if CYGDAT_LWIP_MEM_SECTION_NAME > ... > } > > - lwipopts.h: > > #if CYGSEM_LWIP_MEM_SECTION > #include > #define MEM_SECTION CYGBLD_ATTRIB_SECTION(CYGDAT_LWIP_MEM_SECTION_NAME) > #else > #define MEM_SECTION > #endif > [SNIP] > > It seems to me you can enter some generic CDL component, for example, > component CYG{MEM, or HWR}_HAL_..._SECTION where you can manage also > generic data option (HAL, !LWIP) CYGDAT_HAL_..._SECTION_NAME. Why is > it? I think your idea to utilize all memory can be useful for other > applications too (not only lwIP package). - Right? > > Now, back to our distressful CYGDAT_LWIP_NET_SECTION_NAME data option. > This option in fact should be equal CYGDAT_HAL_..._SECTION_NAME data, > if lwIP package has been added (active_if CYGPKG_NET_LWIP). > > Just now I would not refer to Bug 1001114 here again if we just want to > get new lwIP option to manage the placement of memory pools, in fact, to > have a way for new definition, MEM_SECTION. Let's apply it and go ahead. > > What do you/others think? You're right, let's decouple this bug from Bug 1001114 and go on. Thanks for elaborate discussion. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.