From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10065 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2011 19:50:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 10057 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Feb 2011 19:50:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:50:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D174A2F80005 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:50:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ecoscentric.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jOfdkV6SoPxn; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:50:13 +0000 (GMT) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org To: ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Bug 1001142] User defined linker sections. X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos X-Bugzilla-Component: Patches and contributions X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: sergei.gavrikov@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: low X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:50:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20110213195012.E43A12F78001@mail.ecoscentric.com> Mailing-List: contact ecos-patches-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-patches-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00036.txt.bz2 Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001142 --- Comment #4 from Sergei Gavrikov 2011-02-13 19:50:11 GMT --- (In reply to comment #2) Hi Ilija, > Sergei > > There has been discussion on this in bug 1001114 where user sections were > introduced, and this bug is an outcome of that discussion. Please refer to bug > 1001114 for a complete evolution. Indeed, I read comments on bug 1001114 before to post as I have got doubts about the placement for new macro (architecture ld script), but that is *mine*. To be clear. All SECTION_xxx macros in arch. ld script have stable set of arguments: _region_, _vma_, _lma_; all of them are the very tuned by their own bodies and SECTION_user with a different set of arguments *IMO* is something odd. Well, variants could be CUSTOM_SECTION, DEFINE_SECTION, ABS_SECTION (though I dislike these enters too), so I asked about variant's land. [snip] > - Shall we need this kind of facility for other future variants and how often? > - Is the macro (as is or with reasonable modifications) generic enough to > enter at architecture level? Exactly these questions excited my comment 1. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.