From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19335 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2011 16:59:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 19252 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Mar 2011 16:59:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:59:19 +0000 Received: from localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB582F7800B for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:59:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ecoscentric.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id suAmS4fEP2vD; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:59:16 +0000 (GMT) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org To: ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Bug 1000819] Add support for Atmel AT91SAM9263 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos X-Bugzilla-Component: Patches and contributions X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: grant.b.edwards@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: john@dallaway.org.uk X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:59:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20110316165916.87CD32F7800F@mail.ecoscentric.com> Mailing-List: contact ecos-patches-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-patches-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00037.txt.bz2 Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000819 --- Comment #14 from Grant Edwards 2011-03-16 16:59:15 GMT --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #11) > > Let's start with the ARM7/ARM9 abstraction work (patch 1). This > > looks to be a case of moving the existing HAL cache macros (which > > are not appropriate for AT91SAM9) from the AT91 variant package to > > a new ARM7 package. I assume that there is nothing AT91-specific > > in the new package so it could be used by any other ARM7 ports in > > the future. Please confirm. > > No ARM7 has cache, so it's safe IMO. Samsung S3C45xx ARM7 parts have cache. Or did you mean no Atmel ARM7 parts have cache? -- Grant -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.