From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3000 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2011 17:20:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 2979 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Mar 2011 17:20:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:19:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA682F78004 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:19:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ecoscentric.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PGeyPJU1cAXd; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:19:54 +0000 (GMT) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org To: ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Bug 1000819] Add support for Atmel AT91SAM9263 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos X-Bugzilla-Component: Patches and contributions X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: grant.b.edwards@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: john@dallaway.org.uk X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:20:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20110316171954.AEE282F7800B@mail.ecoscentric.com> Mailing-List: contact ecos-patches-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-patches-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00039.txt.bz2 Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000819 --- Comment #16 from Grant Edwards 2011-03-16 17:19:53 GMT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > > > No ARM7 has cache, so it's safe IMO. > > > > Samsung S3C45xx ARM7 parts have cache. Or did you mean no Atmel > > ARM7 parts have cache? > > Ah ok, that changes things then. This is meant to be a generic ARM7 > HAL. The initial focus is on AT91, but it's definitely not meant to > be an AT91 ARM7 HAL. > > In that case that complicates things. We need to construct the ARM7 > variant hal_cache.h in such a way that a processor HAL > (e.g. S3C45xx) can override all the settings. FWIW, the "snds" port is for the Samsung S3C4500/4510 ARM7 parts and supports the CACHE macros. I haven't looked at it in ages, so I don't know what state it's in. Those parts are so old that I doubt anybody cares enough to re-write the HAL to use any sort of generic ARM7 support. (They are still selling the '4510, but the '4500 died ages ago.) -- Grant -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.