From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5890 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2011 19:06:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 5854 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Mar 2011 19:06:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:06:51 +0000 Received: from localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B5F2F78016 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:06:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ecoscentric.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X1-ZTJqr-iEk; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:06:47 +0000 (GMT) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org To: ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Bug 1000819] Add support for Atmel AT91SAM9263 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos X-Bugzilla-Component: Patches and contributions X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: john@dallaway.org.uk X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: john@dallaway.org.uk X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:06:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20110316190647.79E5D2F78003@mail.ecoscentric.com> Mailing-List: contact ecos-patches-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-patches-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00043.txt.bz2 Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000819 --- Comment #19 from John Dallaway 2011-03-16 19:06:44 GMT --- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #11) > > > Let's try to push through with review and get it checked in. I've > > invited all interested parties to add themselves to the CC list and > > add their own comment where necessary/appropriate. > > I'm a little concerned by Martin Laabs post on the mailing list: > > my port based on the one of Evgeniy Dushitov at the very > beginning. However - after some weeks I discovered that it was very > hard to support more CPUs out of the AT91SAM9 family with that > code-base. > > There are over a dozen closely related parts in that family (all > ARM926EJS CPUs with mostly the same base set of peripherals). Do we > want to head down a road that supports only one of them? Certainly we do not. Neither do we want to introduce significant further delay. I still think it makes sense to use Evgeniy's contribution as the focus for this discussion. It has been formally contributed and used as the baseline for multiple platform ports. Everyone is welcome to comment. The review process will determine what does and does not get checked in. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.