From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16602 invoked by alias); 19 May 2011 13:32:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 16588 invoked by uid 22791); 19 May 2011 13:32:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 13:31:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FA115198F1 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:31:41 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.ecoscentric.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hjFRgmSnXOXv; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:31:40 +0100 (BST) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org To: ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Bug 1000819] Add support for Atmel AT91SAM9263 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos X-Bugzilla-Component: Patches and contributions X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ilijak@siva.com.mk X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: john@dallaway.org.uk X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 13:32:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20110519133140.12DD615197C8@mail.ecoscentric.com> Mailing-List: contact ecos-patches-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-patches-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00024.txt.bz2 Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000819 --- Comment #32 from Ilija Kocho 2011-05-19 14:31:37 BST --- (In reply to comment #31) > (In reply to comment #30) > > > However if larger re-organization of AT91 port is considered, I > > would propose moving AT91 peripherals out of ARM devs subdirectories > > (except for peripherals based on ARM IP, if any). Something like > > this: > > > > packages-+ > > +-devs+ > > +-serial+ > > +-AT91-+ > > +-current-+... > > That's what makes the most sense to me, and it's the way all the other > processor families are supported -- isn't it? I couldn't tell. In general devs looks pretty much scattered to me. For example there are many directories related to Freescale's controllers, I can imagine some of them contain same devices. On the other hand are ARM directories that contain devices that are not related to ARM (architecture or company) merely to chips with ARM cores. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.