From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22572 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2011 13:52:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 22560 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Nov 2011 13:52:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:51:55 +0000 Received: from localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913E43770016 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:51:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ecoscentric.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fkoSeFFxwVGF; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:51:50 +0000 (GMT) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org To: ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Bug 1001388] Convenience macros for manipulating GPIO pins X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos X-Bugzilla-Component: Patches and contributions X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: tf+bugs.ecos@r-finger.com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:52:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20111129135150.9CD0E2FB082B@mail.ecoscentric.com> Mailing-List: contact ecos-patches-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-patches-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2 Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001388 --- Comment #4 from Tomas Frydrych 2011-11-29 13:51:46 GMT --- (In reply to comment #3) Thanks Ilija, > There's not much gain by abbreviation /*_PT?_P/ vs /*_PORT?_P/ I used the PT? because much of the kinetis rm refers to the registers as PTA, etc., but PORTA will be clear enough I think. > Having these macros, the set would be (more) complete with addition of macros > for configuring of port bits /pddr/. Ok, I shall add that. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.