From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13538 invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2012 09:05:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 13528 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jan 2012 09:05:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:05:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B2E2F78007 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:05:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ecoscentric.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mG1tekLd0mwe; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:05:03 +0000 (GMT) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org To: ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Bug 1001463] LPC17XX supplementary code/option patch X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos X-Bugzilla-Component: Patches and contributions X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: bernard.fouche@kuantic.com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: low X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:05:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20120126090503.BD7EC2F78001@mail.ecoscentric.com> Mailing-List: contact ecos-patches-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-patches-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00074.txt.bz2 Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1001463 --- Comment #3 from Bernard Fouch=C3=A9 2012-0= 1-26 09:05:01 GMT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Hi Bernard >=20 > Thank you for your contribution. >=20 > Past couple of days I have committed patches for Bug 1001395 (including b= ug > 1001443) and Bug 1001432. You may need to synchronize your patches accord= ingly. I've first updated my copy of ecos-cvs before making the patch. More exactl= y I was waiting for you to commit to make my patch ;-) >=20 > I could see that some patches cover issues reported (by you) in other bug= s. Can > you submit them there (and obsolete some patches of my own of course)? > Splitting patches will speed up check in for some of them. You are probably referring to bug #1001407. Yes the proposed patch includes changes similar to attachment 1481 (however I didn't use the word 'omplemen= ted' in the comments ;-)) but it adds many more hardware related definitions. Ma= ybe you commit your patch, and then I'll submit a new one that won't have the s= ame fixes? At the moment I have chosen to make my diff vs the ecos cvs repo and= I don't consider pending patches. Maybe I should do differently? >=20 > Also, on your initiative we have started some discussion on bit banding a= t Bug > 1001442 so we can continue there with your patches. So let's first decide how bitband is handled and afterwards I'll update the proposed patch accordingly. Or I can remove the bitband macros in the propo= sed patch. --=20 Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=3Demail ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.