From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28655 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2012 19:28:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 28647 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Feb 2012 19:28:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 19:28:19 +0000 Received: from localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00BC52F7800F for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 19:28:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ecoscentric.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EkIJh-EDN-dN; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 19:28:13 +0000 (GMT) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org To: ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Bug 1001450] Kinetis HAL and driver upgrade X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos X-Bugzilla-Component: Patches and contributions X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: ecos@hotmail.co.uk X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: low X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 19:28:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20120224192812.AA0342F78006@mail.ecoscentric.com> Mailing-List: contact ecos-patches-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-patches-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00083.txt.bz2 Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001450 --- Comment #46 from Christophe Coutand 2012-02-24 19:28:11 GMT --- Thank you, i failed to notice that. Regarding Interrupt priority, I remember a post from Nick mentioning that interrupt 0 (highest priority) is by design reserved (same priority as DEBUG and SVC traps) so it should not be listed in the legal value. Also shouldn't the priority 0xF0 be in the list? Christophe -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.