From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6113 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2012 08:52:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 6104 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Mar 2012 08:52:30 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:52:08 +0000 Received: from localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661FE2FB082E for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:52:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ecoscentric.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sZKxRlymLF-L; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:52:06 +0000 (GMT) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org To: ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Bug 1001537] kernel: porting to GCC 4.6 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos X-Bugzilla-Component: Patches and contributions X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: sergei.gavrikov@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: low X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:52:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20120320085205.EC6BA2F78015@mail.ecoscentric.com> Mailing-List: contact ecos-patches-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-patches-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2 Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001537 --- Comment #3 from Sergei Gavrikov 2012-03-20 08:52:05 GMT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Strictly in mbox1 and kmbox1, we could add a block around the bit in #ifdef > CYGMTH_MBOX_PUT_CAN_WAIT and declare i there. i.e. > > #ifdef CYGMTH_MBOX_PUT_CAN_WAIT > { > int i; > .... > > I'd prefer that, but it's no big deal. Everything else is fine. Thank you. Agreed. The fix has been updated (attachment 1651). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.